serving 2012-12-26 through 2012-12-26
NOTICE A Notice of Intent for the following project submitted in accordance with R307-401-1, Utah Administrative Code (UAC), has been received for consideration by the Director, Utah Division of Air Quality: Company Name: Autoliv ASP, Incorporated Location: Autoliv ASP, Incorporated 1000 West 3300 South, Unit 7, Ogden, UT, Weber County Project Description: Autoliv ASP, Incorporated (Autoliv) is seeking a modification of its Approval Order (AO). It is adding a natural gas-fueled oven with afterburner with a combined rating of 0.39 MMBtu/hr. The December 16, 2011 name and ownership change for the plastics laminate plant aggregated the airbag module manufacturing plant, plastic laminate plant, and automotive airbag manufacturing plant. They have the same owner, SIC code, and the plants are adjacent to each other. With this modification, the two AOs for the plastic laminate plant (DAQE-AN0141670005-11 dated August 9, 2011) and the airbag module manufacturing plant (DAQE-AN016020005-03 dated May 20, 2003) were combined into one AO. Autoliv has requested that the AO for the automotive airbag manufacturing plant (DAQE-AN100250011-11 dated November 29, 2011) have a separate AO. When either of these two AOs is modified or amended, the cumulative emissions will be used to evaluate the source. The original AO for each piece of equipment is listed in the equipment list, and the limits specific to each plant are included in the requirements and limitation section of this AO. Methyl ethyl ketone was removed from the EPA 's list of HAPs on December 19, 2005. Therefore, methyl ethyl ketone is being removed from the airbag module manufacturing plant 's limit. The cumulative limit for the plant 's HAPs has not been altered. The adhesive spray booth was also removed with this modification. Autoliv is located in Ogden (Weber County). The location is in a nonattainment area for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM 10 and PM 2.5 and a maintenance area for CO. Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) (40 CFR Part 63 Subpart ZZZZ) regulations apply to this source. Currently, area sources subject to 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart ZZZZ are exempt from the Title V program. Therefore, Title V does not apply to this source. The emissions, in tons per year, will change as follows: NO x (+) 0.004, SO 2 (+) 0.001, CO (+) 0.14, VOC (+) 0.01, PM 10 (+) 0.01, PM 2.5 (+) 0.01, CO2e (+) 201, and HAPs (+) 0.003. The potential to emit totals for the two combined AOs and the additional equipment, in tons per year, are as follows: NO x = 4.92, SO 2 = 0.11, CO = 16.92, VOC = 66.53, PM 10 = 2.71, PM 2.5 = 2.71, CO2 e = 7310, and HAPs = 20.64. The potential to emit totals for the entire site, including all AOs, and the new equipment, in tons per year, are as follows: NO x = 20.66, SO 2 = 0.34, CO = 52.26, VOC = 71.36, PM 10 = 4.00, PM 2.5 = 4.00, CO2 e = 8,328, and HAPs = 22.35. PM 2.5 emissions are a subset of PM 10 emissions. The completed engineering evaluation and air quality impact analysis showed that the proposed project meets the requirements of federal air quality regulations and the State air quality rules. The Director intends to issue an AO pending a 30-day public comment period. The project proposal, estimate of the effect on local air quality and draft AO are available for public inspection and comment at the Utah Division of Air Quality, 195 North 1950 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116. Written comments received by the Division at this same address on or before January 25, 2013 will be considered in making the final decision on the approval/disapproval of the proposed project. Email comments will also be accepted at hmickelson@utah.gov. If anyone so requests to the Director at the Division in writing within 15 days of publication of this notice, a hearing will be held in accordance with R307-401-7, UAC. Under Section 19-1-301.5, a person who wishes to challenge a Permit Order may only raise an issue or argument during an adjudicatory proceeding that was raised during the public comment period and was supported with sufficient information or documentation to enable the Director to fully consider the substance and significance of the issue. Date of Notice: December 26, 2012 Pub.: December 26, 2012. 509520
NOTICE A Notice of Intent for the following project submitted in accordance with R307-401-1, Utah Administrative Code (UAC), has been received for consideration by the Director, Utah Division of Air Quality: Company Name: Autoliv ASP, Incorporated Location: Autoliv ASP, Incorporated 1000 West 3300 South, Unit 7, Ogden, UT, Weber County Project Description: Autoliv ASP, Incorporated (Autoliv) is seeking a modification of its Approval Order (AO). It is adding a natural gas-fueled oven with afterburner with a combined rating of 0.39 MMBtu/hr. The December 16, 2011 name and ownership change for the plastics laminate plant aggregated the airbag module manufacturing plant, plastic laminate plant, and automotive airbag manufacturing plant. They have the same owner, SIC code, and the plants are adjacent to each other. With this modification, the two AOs for the plastic laminate plant (DAQE-AN0141670005-11 dated August 9, 2011) and the airbag module manufacturing plant (DAQE-AN016020005-03 dated May 20, 2003) were combined into one AO. Autoliv has requested that the AO for the automotive airbag manufacturing plant (DAQE-AN100250011-11 dated November 29, 2011) have a separate AO. When either of these two AOs is modified or amended, the cumulative emissions will be used to evaluate the source. The original AO for each piece of equipment is listed in the equipment list, and the limits specific to each plant are included in the requirements and limitation section of this AO. Methyl ethyl ketone was removed from the EPA 's list of HAPs on December 19, 2005. Therefore, methyl ethyl ketone is being removed from the airbag module manufacturing plant 's limit. The cumulative limit for the plant 's HAPs has not been altered. The adhesive spray booth was also removed with this modification. Autoliv is located in Ogden (Weber County). The location is in a nonattainment area for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM 10 and PM 2.5 and a maintenance area for CO. Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) (40 CFR Part 63 Subpart ZZZZ) regulations apply to this source. Currently, area sources subject to 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart ZZZZ are exempt from the Title V program. Therefore, Title V does not apply to this source. The emissions, in tons per year, will change as follows: NO x (+) 0.004, SO 2 (+) 0.001, CO (+) 0.14, VOC (+) 0.01, PM 10 (+) 0.01, PM 2.5 (+) 0.01, CO2e (+) 201, and HAPs (+) 0.003. The potential to emit totals for the two combined AOs and the additional equipment, in tons per year, are as follows: NO x = 4.92, SO 2 = 0.11, CO = 16.92, VOC = 66.53, PM 10 = 2.71, PM 2.5 = 2.71, CO2 e = 7310, and HAPs = 20.64. The potential to emit totals for the entire site, including all AOs, and the new equipment, in tons per year, are as follows: NO x = 20.66, SO 2 = 0.34, CO = 52.26, VOC = 71.36, PM 10 = 4.00, PM 2.5 = 4.00, CO2 e = 8,328, and HAPs = 22.35. PM 2.5 emissions are a subset of PM 10 emissions. The completed engineering evaluation and air quality impact analysis showed that the proposed project meets the requirements of federal air quality regulations and the State air quality rules. The Director intends to issue an AO pending a 30-day public comment period. The project proposal, estimate of the effect on local air quality and draft AO are available for public inspection and comment at the Utah Division of Air Quality, 195 North 1950 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116. Written comments received by the Division at this same address on or before January 25, 2013 will be considered in making the final decision on the approval/disapproval of the proposed project. Email comments will also be accepted at hmickelson@utah.gov. If anyone so requests to the Director at the Division in writing within 15 days of publication of this notice, a hearing will be held in accordance with R307-401-7, UAC. Under Section 19-1-301.5, a person who wishes to challenge a Permit Order may only raise an issue or argument during an adjudicatory proceeding that was raised during the public comment period and was supported with sufficient information or documentation to enable the Director to fully consider the substance and significance of the issue. Date of Notice: December 26, 2012 Pub.: December 26, 2012. 509520